Went to the 2nd night of the course last night. The project for this weekend is as follows.
Photograph people against a background: pick the background first and then position the person in front. Frankly, I’m adding to the blandness of this project and saying “and make the background relevant to the person standing in front of it.” I’ll post what I shoot – if you want to play along, feel free to do the same!
I felt there was a bit of a problem at the end of last nights ‘lesson’ in that we hadn’t really been taught anything. We’d all done the first project and lecturer was so keen not to hurt anyone’s feelings that there was little judgement on honesty. There was no hard teaching being offered up at ll; he seemed to want us to discuss a lot but our group seems to want to be taught. And why shouldn’t we – it’s not a cheap course at the local college, it’s an expensive course at the best art school in the country for goodness sake. In the end, at an obvious loss to know what to do with us (“There’s an hour left, there’s 40 minutes left, what do you want to do” is not what you want to hear from your lecturer…), he had the bright idea of setting up a studio light and the flash trigger and show us how to take meter readings and fire the flash. I think we felt that could have happened first thing last week and this was progress at least. What would have been useful too would have been if he’d been reviewing our photos in camera at the time and helping us improve as we went along: e.g. mine were all underexposed and had to be fixed in Lightshop when I got home.
Tony and I stayed behind at the end and – hopefully, kindly but directly – fed back that we were a bit bored and for the cost of the course we needed more robust teaching. The lecturer shared that he found us a tricky group because we were quiet whereas his other group this term had spent the whole session discussing their own work from the previous week. I suggested he let us know what he needed from us and we would try to help, but I thought he could help by being more bossy and instructive. I hope this is resolved next week.
Here’s some of the results from the studio below; all with the exposure increased in Lightshop which leads me to the question:
- did we take the reading wrong?
- was the light meter wrong?
- should we just have been taking readings more often?
- how should I have known the settings were out at the time?
- does my camera need uniformly different settings to the light meter reading?
If you know the answers, please do post!!!

I might change the backgrounds in photoshop if I get time at the weekend.